Saturday, May 15, 2010

Three reasons why India failed

India failed


As India goes out again, resulting in a box-office dud. This will lead to much chest-beating and screaming, a expression or two to start anywhere, and will the TV cameras are there. But beyond providing an outlet for our frustration, making it possible for catharsis, all that will complete anything. Those who call for the leaders of our cricketers are among those who bow respectfully at the earliest opportunity. Currently we are armed with hindsight, that greatest of all voters. It gives us great wisdom and prudence, but gives no consequences.

I am afraid that India was not good enough. From time to time it is difficult to accept, but it's actually the truth. Another batsman could have been picked, a second spinner might have made here, but there was no Bradman and Sobers survived. Yes, it was a Tendulkar but that subdivision is already part of the story. One can argue that picked them were men with great skill, but it is an ally who is fighting only a quarter of a war at best. above and beyond the fact that attitudes are weapons to keep and not to weapons were rusty is a question to be asked and answered unemotionally.

So why India was not good enough? Among many reasons, three position out.

The new ball in the hands of India's Bowling, gave no opinion. It was not the first server that it should be. It was just a procedure that must be achieved for a game to start, just a pawn, which was pushed forward with little purpose. The new ball on flat pitches and because with short boundaries is like a toy for a spoiled child throwing around, but had fangs. India's openers had shown them, the opposition was not. It is a serious difficulty. New-ball Bowling can be grown and food as they grow into beautiful trees, they can not at first sight of a storm, wither absent.

India's Fielding stood out. As a radio can be, or as my old phone does. It was like a retro film. In the case of Fielding, or athletic, India makes some concession to modernity, flirting with the latest and fall back towards the old and contented. When Australia took the field, I thought more than once that their hockey players had come. They were smooth, and slid around and did it otherwise would have been three one two. Big catch came with the frequency of a politician's quotes. It was beautiful to see, but I do not think our young cricketers watch. They require the last time, but they do not show it.

As India's finest, Yuvraj stood-on the house they tired quickly and slow spin bowler. In the long and beautiful legs, arms and legs were rotated to start. It was tender, because it should have been. He is a cricket player who is blessed, and a period of humble introspection can only be correct prescription. Sales took one km since it was wrong.

And India cannot play the rising ball. Enjoy it, but everybody has to live with it. The modern game caused some people to think they can ignore it, but here in the Caribbean last year in England, has come to the realization that even in Twenty20 cricket, you can find out. Although much cricket players Gautam Gambhir looked out of sorts. He looked tired when the ball came to him with cruelty. And Suresh Raina, the brightest of India's young cricket players to come up with a explanation.

Not one of these three errors were unknown, and it would be easy to blame the system and buses for it. Teachers can not write the exam, students are responsibility, and finally they have to figure it out yourself and then we come back to approach. There is no point critique of pitches and bowling in domestic cricket for lack of ability to play a short tone bowling. Gavaskar arisen from the same school that did Tendulkar, Dravid and Laxman himself. Abhinav Bindra and Saina Nehwal are products of such a system. Azharuddin emerge as one of the world's finest fielder.Greatness lies in rising above the system. It is not the system, consequently, but the work ethic, which is located in the heart of accomplishment. I am not saying India's cricketers do not possess it, it's just that they do not show it often enough.

From here it is necessary young Indian cricketers to ask themselves whether they want to be rich too search or want a place in history. There is a choice they must make. at present, they are not good enough, but pelting abuse and odd stones at them will not solve the dilemma, just point the finger at ourselves.

No comments:

Post a Comment